They all look crystal clear to the point of convincing me that HD looks better than real life. There’s a nautilus, cuttlefish gallore, and of course the under sea staple appearance of the great white shark. There’s no doubt they’ll be sucked into the beautiful photography as they’re introduced to things that look like they crawled out of a mad man’s night terror. It’s reduced to something you throw on to keep the brats from crying and stealing each others toys for half an hour. It’s a completely different experience in a completely different environment. The problem here is that we’re dealing with a very brief documentary that was made specifically for that format being released for home viewing. There is no way right now to even come close to recreating that kind of picture or experience. “Good lord! He’s eating the shit out of me. IMAX: Under the Sea tries to capitalize on the success of BBC’s documentaries but it barely even touches the surface and ends up drowning in a sea of monotony and pulling us down with it by our underpants. No one did it better and no one will ever do it better than BBC with Blue Planet. But to really understand it and gather an awareness of how important it is or how many amazing things live there, you really need to spend some time with it. It’s very easy to be fascinated by the wonders and life in a world that’s right here with us, but impossible for us to live in. The ocean is a big place, full of all kinds of awesome things to look at. Jim Carrey tries his best not to bore us as we’re briskly brought to Papua New Guinea, South Australia, The Great Barrier Reef and Indonesia to experience what life’s like under the sea and what we can do to make sure it keeps on doing what it’s doing, which is eating the hell out of each other. Its IMAX: Under The Sea 3D only not in 3D or IMAX! What more could you ask for?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |